Opposition MPs call for emergency probe of health agency's use of Canadians' mobile data during COVID – National Post

Science & Technology

It is ‘extremely alarming’ that a government body would use the pandemic as an excuse to secretly collect the mobile data of Canadians without telling them, a Conservative MP said
Author of the article:
OTTAWA — All three main opposition parties are calling for a review of the Public Health Agency of Canada’s plan to continue using anonymized cellphone location data of Canadians to track travel patterns during the pandemic.
Conservative MPs called PHAC’s actions “extremely alarming,” and asked for an emergency meeting of the House of Commons ethics committee, a request supported by the Bloc Québécois.
NDP ethics critic Matthew Green said it was an “intrusion on the privacy of Canadians, who deserve to know what kind of information the government” is and plans on collecting.
The Public Health Agency is seeking to extend its use of the de-identified, anonymized data. It posted a request for proposals in December, asking for a contract for a third party to “provide access to cell-tower/operator location data to assist in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and for other public health applications.” The contractor would provide “de-identified cell-tower based location data from January 1, 2019.” The contract ends on 2023, with the option to renew for another three years.
The first contract to track the data expired in the fall.
There are no legal restrictions on companies handing over such data to government, as long as it’s anonymized. Authorities need a warrant to track an individual’s location, but companies are free to provide de-identified, anonymized data showing, for instance, how many Canadians travelled during a lockdown.
PHAC said in a statement it has “used de-identified (without personal identifiers) and aggregated data to inform the Government of Canada’s response to COVID-19.” While PHAC said it has “consulted with privacy and ethics experts, including the Office of the Privacy Commissioner” at “every step,” the federal privacy commissioner’s office said it was only informed, not consulted, about the program.
“We have regular meetings with Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada on various COVID initiatives. As part of these conversations, we were informed of this particular initiative in 2020. At times, PHAC and Health Canada seek our advice, at other times they do not. In this case, they did not seek our advice on this initiative,” spokesperson Vito Pilieci said.
The Privacy Commissioner has now received “several complaints” about the program and is looking at next steps, he said.
PHAC obtained at least some of its data through Telus’ Data for Good program, which was launched in the spring of 2020 in response to the emergence of the COVID-19 virus. The program, which won a privacy award from the International Association of Privacy Professionals, provides de-identified, aggregated data to governments, health authorities and researchers. Under that program, PHAC or any government agency wouldn’t have had access to personally identifiable data on Canadians.
PHAC didn’t respond by deadline when asked whether the data it used was entirely through the Telus program.
PHAC is not the only government agency to tap into Telus’ data. At launch, the telecom company said in a press release it would provide data to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC). On its website it promotes testimonials on the Data for Good program from the City of Surrey and Ottawa Public Health.
The company didn’t answer by deadline when asked how many governments at the municipal, provincial or federal level it has contracts with.
Conservative ethics critic John Brassard said at a press conference Monday there is “no ability for parliamentary scrutiny to determine what this information has been used for, what outcomes the agency and by extension the government, is hoping to achieve to mitigate the damage being done by COVID in our communities, and what protections are in place to ensure that the privacy of Canadians has been and will be protected under this program.”
Bloc MP René Villemure, who signed the letter to the House ethics committee asking for an emergency meeting, said there’s not enough information to determine whether PHAC was right to obtain the information in the way it did.
“We have enough doubts that we can ask questions,” he said in an interview. One of the issues is that PHAC was using the data “without telling anybody,” Villemure said.
He said the health agency’s request for proposals, which is scheduled to close on Jan. 21, should be put on hold “so that we can learn more about it. And this is what we’re going to do with the committee.”
Colouring everything from hair to fashion and interior design
We tried it …
Wellness coach on setting yourself up for a good night’s rest
From relaxation and creative inspiration to aiding with content creation, music is a tool worth exploring
Some essentials and words of wisdom from public health experts
Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2022 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

source